Agastya's Ancient Indian Battery - Was Electricity used in Ancient Civilizations?

 I have been recreating the electric battery, which was used in Ancient India. This battery was described by a sage called Agastya who lived at least 4000 years ago, and what I am making is according to what's being described in the ancient text called Agastya Samhita. Watch the video below or read on. 

This text, talks about using an earthen pot as a container and using two types of metals: Copper and Zinc. So, this is how the setup looks. If I test this with a voltmeter, you can see there is no voltage so far. Now, the text mentions that sawdust must be put in the container. 
When we add sawdust in the container, the sawdust goes in between the two metals, and makes sure they don't touch each other, or create a short circuit. If we check the voltage now, we can see that it is already producing 0.4 or xx volts. But the text mentions adding yet another strange material to complete the battery: The neck of a peacock. In the ancient Sanskrit text this material is mentioned as shikhigreeva, which means the neck of a peacock. Many secret cults exist even today, and these people still trying to recreate the battery using the actual neck of a peacock. For example, even this year, 10 peacocks were found dead by strangulation in India, and cops are trying to figure out as to why this is happening. This is because these cults are trying to use the peacocks neck to recreate the ancient Indian battery. But this is a mistake, because all ancient texts, especially those related to alchemy use code words, to confuse the public.  Even Isaac Newton mentions using Green Lion, and experts are trying to figure out what he actually meant.
In ancient Indian alchemy, the neck of the peacock actually refers to copper sulfate solution. You can see that both of them have the same color. So, I bought copper sulfate, and I have made it into a solution, and as soon as I add this liquid, you can see the voltage rising up dramatically. Here it is showing xx volts. So, you can see that what's mentioned in the ancient text is actually capable of making electricity. Remember, we read in history books that the electric battery was created by a man called  Alessandro Volta just 200 years ago, but sage Agastya used this battery at least 4000 years ago.  But what's really strange is that Alessandro Volta uses pretty much the same materials for  creating  the "very first battery". He used copper and zinc plates just like Agastya, and instead of using copper sulfate, he used sulfuric acid.

Now, going back to the ancient text, Agastya says, use 100 containers and you can create a very effective force. Here, I have just used 3 of them in series and you can see that the voltage increases to 3 volts or xxx volts. Now, if I connect a small Led bulb, you can see that it glows. 

This is a very interesting point that the ancient text mentions using the batteries for increasing the voltage. The natural question is "WHY" was this used? Why did ancient people use multiple containers to produce high voltage electricity?  Did they use it for lighting purposes, just like modern times? If so, is there any evidence that electric bulbs were used in ancient times?

By Olaf Tausch - Own work, CC BY 3.0, 

In the Dendera Temple  of ancient Egypt, there are strange carvings which show the usage of electric bulbs. These carvings were also created 4000 years ago, and you can see huge electric bulbs with snake like filaments inside. What's even more interesting is that there are wires coming out of these bulbs and going into a box. Did this box, contain Agastya's battery of 100 cells, producing 100 volts to illuminate these bulbs? If this is true, this might explain how ancient structures like Giza Pyramid and Kailasa Temple were constructed in such a short period of time. If we visit the Kailasa temple for example, the chambers inside are so dark, that nothing is visible. There is no way to use mirrors or metal sheets to reflect sunlight into these chamber for illumination. But, there are spectacular, flawless carvings created inside these chambers. Creating such brilliant carvings is impossible with flickering flames of natural fire. How was it possible, without the use of steady electric light? If we assume, that ancient people did use torches and used light from fire, for creating this temple and carvings, there should be a lot of soot or carbon deposited on the ceilings. But there is no trace of soot or carbon on the ceilings at all. How do we explain the creation of these brilliant monuments? Is it possible that the ancient people were using battery powered lights? How else do we explain this ancient battery, mentioned thousands of years ago by Agastya?

Agastya actually explained many advanced technical devices in the same book. He talks about battery powered vehicles. Today we have electric bikes which use just 24 volts. The text mentions Electroplating which can be easily done with this set up. He talks about splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen, and using this hydrogen in balloons for traveling. We do hot air balloon rides today.

He also talks about the concept of an electric motor. I have set up 5 of these cells, and there is enough power to charge a cell phone and we can even run a motor. This is really fascinating because, once we realize that these type of gadgets were used in ancient times, we can understand how ancient temples like Hoysaleswaratemple were built. I've shown you the machine made pillars in this temple, and even archeologists agree that these were made using lathe technology. If Agastya's batteries and motors were used along with the gears and machining tools carved on the Hoysaleswara temple, we can easily produce these machine made pillars.

Now, why did Agastya use earthen pots instead of other items? If he could use metals like copper and zinc, he could have easily used these metals, wood or glass for the container. The reason for using earthen pot is this. it cools what's inside, by a process called evaporative cooling. The efficiency of the battery, dramatically changes with its temperature, so the earthen pot will keep the battery at its optimal temperature.  

If these earthen pot batteries were used in large numbers in ancient times, we should have found at least a few of them. Believe it or not, archeologists have unearthed thousands of these pots, in varying sizes all over India. The usual theory is that these pots were used for burying dead people, but they have also excavated many, many pots which don't contain human remains, but have metal plates instead. For example, in the village of Chandayan, several pots were unearthed with copper plates inside them. Archeologists estimate that these are also 4000 years old, which matches the timeline of sage Agastya.


Are all of these evidences just coincidences? The ancient battery that can light up a bulb -  The electric bulbs carved in ancient Egypt - Carvings in the dark chambers of Kailasa temple, with absolutely no natural light - Today's motors running using just 5 cells? The machine made pillars of Hoysaleswara temple - Thousands of excavated earthen pots with copper and metal plates. Are all these evidences mere coincidences or do they prove that ancient civilizations used advanced technology? Please let me know your thoughts in the comments section. 

4 comments:

I appreciate your effort in researching and explaining the hidden facts of Indian ancient temples, places and carvings. Hats off to your dedication on this . I support you always.

Hats off to u Man. Just one query , Have u tried carbon dating of any of our temple.

in my opinion, I would just first thank n congratulate the author for his great work , my friend, even the actual history of Sikhism related places was not known untill some recent researches....that is relatively very much new as compared to these alll....why bcz it was depicted wrongly by the historians.......n nobody doubted n believed it.....for example all details abt guru nanak dev ji's udasis were taken from bhai bala janamsakhi.....n was blindly taken as the evidence....but recent researches show the grammar n language used inguru ji's time n the time this janamsakhi's discovery....then some enthusiast scholars started reseaching on the things...as guru ji have given hints in his own bani.....n hv got many clues regarding his travels to far even Australia n americas n europe.......n it is now thought that to make people from younger generations think differently by the mughals or britishers may be.........so this could be the case......may be the aryans didn't want people to understand the great indian history......n changed all the scene by damaging or destroying the all evidences.......think by yourself.....bcz aryans came from west but south indians dravidians may be were natives....or some other foreigners who wanted to destroy Indian golden history..........I wud love to see ur reply as well........on this .....I want to know if u think similarly

Great observation and research work being brought by you. But number of viewers of such kind of great research work on internet is still has a saturation point while comparing the same with that of television. But ironically it is also a fact that all such TV channels like Discovery, NGC or History etc. which show such programs, never disclose these facts and never bring an Indian researcher to bring forward these facts for the obvious reason of proving themselves and their work wrong as have been presented for many years.

Post a Comment

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More